We Review Essay Example

We Review Paper Essay on We Stupor shout Mariupol boring and unbearable thing quiet hysteria. A review of all the good detail, thanks, NATA. And wonderful conclusion a nightmare! It is true: on the one hand the funny, the other a nightmare. The protagonist a mathematician lime, all technocratic nonsense, foolishness with tsifiryu, numerous references to Taylor (scholarship fruits from England), about the room, Gas, etc. reminiscent of Bulgakovs such nonsense pituitary in the same period (almost all of them are twins), by the way, buddy Zamyatin like writing dominates both over, alas, minimally necessary knowledge of what. Neutral parody retelling prejudice Unified Reader heads of his time. So the first sad all the predictions of future relations between the state and the person that supposedly guessed Zamyatin. Nonsense, do not guess anything at this point the story has all of the proposed set of Zamyatin discoveries have tried, but its a long story, do not know what the reader Zamyatin and will never know, but it it not necessary The second sad Zamyatin He ascribes the future narrow-minded idea of ​​State and all these things for some reason called then dystopia. That is, as they say, our friend Dr. Evil, no channel: the thing is, what is the state the phenomenon of the archaic past, not the future here all inexperienced readers and thrown, and therefore it was found that not over a thousand years and only ten more of Zamyatin absurdity began to manifest itself as a blotter in the relationship of law and human and we, in Germany. And that in actual fact it was clear about it in the mid-20s? Amazingly, I understood and predicted it at the same time, Nikolai Ivanovich Bolshevik theorist, a favorite of the party, which was destroyed along with it in the 30s, but later rediscovered skeptic Steven Cohen. We Review Essay Example We Review Paper Essay on We In the novel We Zamyatin creates a model of the One State, where the life of every well-regulated, and the man is only a cog in a streamlined, pre-programmed mechanism. At the head of the State Benefactor, who is assisted by Keepers. Jobs solely for the benefit of all, love only the pink coupons names what an anachronism, everyone the number, it dehumanizes, averages, and impersonal people easier to manage, because they no longer feel the personalities, extraordinary, not like the others, with its advantages and disadvantages. Instead of clothes uniforms, instead of freedom of choice the complete subjugation instead of entertainment laudatory odes Benefactor and marching under the anthem of the One State. It would seem that, in this strictly rational, reasonable little world where emotions are suppressed, and the collective interest prevails over personal, everything is predetermined in advance, but thats a surprise the D-503 suddenly (! Horror of horrors) begins to form the soul. - It is very dangerous I babbled. Terminally cut with scissors. It really is very dangerous, because the D-503 will be the personality that is different from the other, original and unique in its kind, and most importantly feel the taste of freedom. And this can not be avoid, because in this case could start the epidemic, and control over the lives of ciphers will be lost. D-503 is not alone in his illness, there are still people who do not want such happiness in which satisfied all their needs, except for one the opportunity to be themselves, and not fully comply with the preset order and suppress my personality. Order given Benefactor Great Operation. Why worry, to fear, to feel, to experience, to torment yourself with questions, doubts, illusions, if you can get rid of it remove imagination and feelings. Happening the revolt, but if it turned out as intended conspirators An interesting novel style crisp, curt, abrupt proposal, the emotional stress that comes through in all the narrative and is transmitted from the main character readers, amazing metaphors: old moon smile inky familiar, saffron-yellow silk, smile vinegar, the drawn curtain eyes , sweet, sharp, white teeth; smile. She disclosed cup chair like a bee in her sting and honey , crumbling rocky ribs and teeth yellow walls At first, all this hard to take, and then gradually get involved, and not easy to come off and move on. this little world, where everything seems illusory, curved, like a mathematically verified, attractive and repulsive at the same time. Constant movement, event speaker one image is replaced by another, a mathematical term used to describe a quadrangle, and it freckled face, irrational root of minus one, I purposely chose the path not the hypotenuse, and two Catete ., dvoyakoizognutye lips We will write a custom essay sample on We Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on We Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on We Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer one of the sites I came across when discussing the novel with the comment: We have never and will never confess that it is of such operations are sometimes secretly dreams not right? I would very much like to believe that it is not that we are different, n e dream and do not want to turn into a zombie, obedient robots, mechanically and indifferently looking at the world, do not feel anything, but quite believe it can not. Something prevents We Review Essay Example We Review Paper Essay on We The book is heavy and complicated. Interestingly, the attempt to imagine and draw a picture of the future society led all who undertook it for a very sad conclusion (Jack London. The Iron Heel). It is quite another thing when the people were taken for this Sophisticated in theory! One of the most interesting attempts to imagine the future of society, relying on the understanding of the reality of trends, were NI ideas Bukharin. In 1916, they were actually given ( the theory of the imperialist state), the foresight of the new Leviathan a militaristic state capitalism of proximal development of state organisms since there is no socialist revolution is only possible in the form of a militarist state capitalism. Centralization centralization becomes a barracks inevitably gain the upper among the most infamous warlords, beastly drill proletariat, bloody repression. Island (before the break in relations!) Controversy surrounding the article with Lenin at the end of last, not only led t o a complete agreement with the conclusions of Bukharin (in May 1917), but also to write his famous work of Lenin, The State and Revolution. Bukharin scholar Stephen Cohen (historian, political scientist, professor at Princeton University) specifically noted the growing anxiety among Bukharins theoretical, becoming almost prophetic question: Do imagine the possibility of a third type of a modern society can not not capitalist or socialist? Unwilling to evasion in unpleasant theoretical problems, Bukharin between 1915 and 1928. I raised the issue of four (!) times. he replied each time in the affirmative, but stressed that, although such a society is conceivable in theory, in reality it is impossible. Two examples show the direction of his thinking. Bukharin was the first who in 1915 pointed to the possibility of non-socialist non-market economy: If the commodity mode of production then we destroyed would be very special economic form (!) (!) it would no longer capitalism, as the pr oduction of goods would disappear; but still less than it would be socialism, as would be preserved (and even deepened to) the domination of one class over another. Such an economic structure would resemble most closed slave economy, when there is no slave market. In 1928, he returns to this theme: Here there is a planned economy, organized distribution, not only in terms of communication and relationships between the different branches of production, but also in terms of consumption. The slave in this society gets its share of food items that make up the total product of labor. It can get very small, but the crisis still is not. We Review Essay Example We Review Paper Essay on We Stupor shout Mariupol boring and unbearable thing quiet hysteria. A review of all the good detail, thanks, NATA. And wonderful conclusion a nightmare! It is true: on the one hand the funny, the other a nightmare. The protagonist a mathematician lime, all technocratic nonsense, foolishness with tsifiryu, numerous references to Taylor about Gas room, etc. reminiscent of Bulgakovs such nonsense pituitary in the same period (almost all of them are twins), by the way, buddy Zamyatin like writing dominates both over, alas, minimally necessary knowledge of what. Neutral parody retelling prejudice Unified Reader heads of his time. So the first sad all the predictions of future relations between the state and the person that supposedly guessed Zamyatin. Nonsense, do not guess anything at this point the story has all of the proposed set of Zamyatin discoveries have tried, but its a long story, do not know what the reader Zamyatin and will never know, but it it not necessary The second sad Zamyatin He ascribes the future narrow-minded idea of ​​State and all these things for some reason called then dystopia. That is, as they say, our friend Dr. Evil, no channel: the thing is, what is the state the phenomenon of the archaic past, not the future here all inexperienced readers and thrown, and therefore it was found that not over a thousand years and only ten more of Zamyatin absurdity began to manifest itself as a blotter and Human relations States (and by the way we have, and in Germany). And what in actual fact is the fact that it was clear then? And I understand and accurately predicted this at the same time only one theorist Nikolai Ivanovich, later rediscovered skeptic Steven Cohen.